On 6 March 2025, Presidential Circular No. 2025/3 on the Prevention of Mobbing at Workplaces (“Circular”) was published in the Official Gazette No. 32833 and entered into force repealing the previous Presidential Circular No. 2011/2 on this matter, which was published in the Official Gazette No. 27879 on 19 March 2011 (“Previous Circular”). The Circular primarily emphasizes the necessity of preventing mobbing at workplaces to enhance employee motivation, foster a healthy, safe, and inclusive work environment, support effective service delivery, and ensure sustainable employment.
The significant provisions introduced by the Circular are as follows:
- Psychological Harassment Prevention Board has been restructured. The Psychological Harassment Prevention Board (“Board”), originally established under the Previous Circular, has been restructured with an expanded scope of responsibilities. The primary responsibilities of the Board include developing nationwide policies to prevent mobbing at workplaces, coordinating training and awareness programmes, conducting public awareness initiatives, carrying out research, and preparing relevant guidance documents.
- Employers and executives have been assigned with significant responsibilities. The Circular emphasizes that the primary responsibility for combating psychological harassment at workplaces lies with employers and executives, who must avoid any actions or behaviours that could be considered psychological harassment. Under the Circular, employers and executives are required to identify and assess risks that may constitute or lead to psychological harassment and to develop relevant preventive and protective policies. In this regard, employers are obliged to organize training programs to raise awareness about psychological harassment at the workplace and to inform employees about available reporting mechanisms and their rights under situations where they are exposed to harassment. The Circular also underlines that during an investigation concerning psychological harassment allegations at the workplace, confidentiality and privacy of concerned individuals must be protected, and a cautious, meticulous, and prompt approach should be adopted especially to prevent reputational damage from unfounded claims. Additionally, the Circular highlights the importance of taking necessary preventive and protective measures under collective labour agreements regarding psychological harassment.
- The institutions to which employees can submit complaints to have been expanded. Employees who are subjected to psychological harassment will continue to receive guidance and counselling from specialized psychologists available at the ALO 170 support hotline. In addition, the Circular stipulates that concerned employees can also submit their complaints to the Presidency’s Communication Centre at the Petition Commission of the Turkish Grand National Assembly, Ministry of Labour and Social Security, the Human Rights and Equality Institution, and/or the Ombudsman Institution of Türkiye.
In conclusion, the Circular reinforces employers’ obligation to oversee and prevent mobbing at the workplace, mandating the implementation of preventive, protective, and awareness-enhancing measures. Accordingly, employers are expected to establish effective policies to protect employees from psychological harassment, strengthen complaint mechanisms, and expand awareness on this matter through regular training and educational initiatives. Additionally, the Circular maintains existing complaint and support mechanisms for employees, while aiming to increase nationwide awareness, expand training and research initiatives, and foster a healthier workplace environment through the Psychological Harassment Prevention Board.
Share
Related persons
You can contact us for detailed information.


Legal Information
This briefing is for information purposes; it is not legal advice. If you have questions, please call us. All rights reserved.
You May Be Interested In
10 September 2026
The Turkish Competition Authority releases a leading food delivery platform from most of its binding commitments following the loss of its dominance, but keeps the narrow price parity commitment in place for two more years
This article examines the Turkish Competition Board’s Yemek Sepeti Decision, assessing a request for the removal of commitments made…
9 September 2026
Türkiye’s defence sector: investment climate, legal framework and strategic outlook
Türkiye’s defence industry has undergone a notable transformation in recent years, both in terms of production capabilities and…
2 September 2026
The ACFE Report to the Nations 2026: key considerations for general counsel and compliance officers in Türkiye
Occupational fraud rarely remains a purely financial issue. It can quickly become a board-level governance concern, create regulatory…
1 September 2026
More power, less protection: job security exclusions for employer representatives
The Turkish Labour Code establishes a comprehensive job security framework that shields employees from unjustified dismissal. It does,…
31 August 2026
Significant CMB principle decisions on block trades and IPOs
On 27, 28 and 31 August 2026, the Capital Markets Board of Türkiye issued principle decisions introducing significant changes to the rules…
25 August 2026
Turkish competition law newsletter – Issue 2026/3
Turkish competition enforcement has entered a phase in which the Turkish Competition Authority’s most consequential interventions…
