We usher in this Autumn season with another eventful agenda from the Turkish Competition Authority (the “Authority” or the “TCA”). Before delving into the headlines of the season, we believe a brief overview of the Authority’s activities could be insightful to underscore our point: The Authority initiated six new investigations in the first half of the season and concluded six different existing investigations. Moreover, it cleared twenty transactions across various industries and published sixty reasoned decisions, which involve highly debated probes, levying fines on major technology entities such as Meta and Elon Musk.
Starting with Meta, the company was fined EUR 18.6 million for abusing its dominant position by collecting personal data through changes to WhatsApp’s privacy policy. It is reasonable to assume that this case, along with the increasing use of personal data by other tech giants, prompted the Authority to delve deeper into the intersection between data protection and competition, making this topic one of the highlights of the season. This is substantiated by a recent announcement from the Authority stating they have signed an official information exchange and cooperation protocol with the Turkish Personal Data Protection Authority, aiming to foster effective competition in the relevant market and to enhance consumers’ control over their personal data.
Another notable event this year was the monetary fine imposed on Elon Musk, marking the TCA’s first gun-jumping case involving the novel technology undertaking concept. The Authority recently published the reasoned decision of the Musk case, revealing interesting details on why Musk/Twitter did not notify the transaction. One of the main arguments raised by Twitter was that the deal was signed before the enactment of the technology undertaking amendment. The Authority, however, rejected Twitter’s arguments, accepting the closing date as the date when the control change occurred and decided to fine the acquirer, Elon Musk, for violating the suspension requirement.
These developments underscore the Authority’s diligence in identifying violations and imposing monetary fines. The President of the TCA publicly acknowledged that the Authority has ramped up its investments and capacity to analyse digital data and information technology, naturally leading to an uptick in the number of investigations as well as on-site inspections. This is also reflected in the Authority’s recently published annual report for the year 2022, showcasing the Authority’s enforcement activity in numbers: A total of 342 cases were concluded, encompassing 78 competition infringement cases, 19 exemption/negative clearance applications, and 245 merger control cases. Moreover, the TCA conducted an astonishing number of on-site inspections – 831 in total – and 54 investigations, resulting in a total of TRY 1.73 billion in administrative fines.
In this regard, we will explore a variety of the aforementioned topics in this Autumn Issue, which we trust you will find beneficial.
You may reach the entire newsletter here.
Share
Related persons
You can contact us for detailed information.

Legal Information
This is for information purposes; it is not legal advice. As laws and their interpretation may change, please consult Turkish legal counsel to confirm the current position and obtain advice tailored to your circumstances before making any decision or taking action in relation to your matter in Türkiye. All rights reserved.
You May Be Interested In
7 October 2026
Mandatory implementation of the secure payment system for real estate sales postponed to 1 December 2026
With the Regulation Amending the Regulation on Real Estate Trade, which was published in the Official Gazette dated 29 April 2026 and…
25 September 2026
Recent developments in healthcare legislation – Issue 2026/2
On 21 April 2026, the Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency published amendments to the guideline with a view to streamlining the…
10 September 2026
The Turkish Competition Authority releases a leading food delivery platform from most of its binding commitments following the loss of its dominance, but keeps the narrow price parity commitment in place for two more years
This article examines the Turkish Competition Board’s Yemek Sepeti Decision, assessing a request for the removal of commitments made…
9 September 2026
Türkiye’s defence sector: investment climate, legal framework and strategic outlook
Türkiye’s defence industry has undergone a notable transformation in recent years, both in terms of production capabilities and…
2 September 2026
The ACFE Report to the Nations 2026: key considerations for general counsel and compliance officers in Türkiye
Occupational fraud rarely remains a purely financial issue. It can quickly become a board-level governance concern, create regulatory…
1 September 2026
More power, less protection: job security exclusions for employer representatives
The Turkish Labour Code establishes a comprehensive job security framework that shields employees from unjustified dismissal. It does,…