Our latest article “Competition authorities increase scrutiny in banking industry” by Togan Turan and Gülçin Dere is published on Lexology.
In recent years, competition authorities have not only become more vigorous in investigating anti-trust claims in financial services, but also more diligent in imposing significant fines on banks. In a recent decision, the European Commission (EC) has imposed unprecedented fines of up to EUR 1.07 billion on Barclays, the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), Citigroup, JPMorgan and MUFG Bank (formerly Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi) for getting involved in a foreign exchange spot trading cartel1. One of the addressee of the decision, UBS, was however exempted from fines due to its cooperation with the EC under the EC’s Leniency Program2.
After an extensive investigation, the EC found that competing Forex spot traders exchanged competitively sensitive information via various online professional chatrooms to coordinate their strategies on behalf of five banks3. The in-depth investigation revealed that there were two distinct cartels as part of the overall collusive behaviour in the market for Spot Foreign Exchange4. The first one, the so-called ‘Forex-Three Way Banana Split’ cartel involving Barclays, RBS, Citigroup and JPMorgan, lasted from December 2007 to January 2013, while the second one, known as the ‘Forex- Essex Express’ cartel, involved Barclays, RBS and MUFG Bank and extended from December 2009 to July 20125.
Similarly, the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) addressed the guilty pleas of five banks for colluding to manipulate the price of U.S. Dollars and Euros exchanged in the foreign currency exchange (FX) spot market in 20156. The DOJ concluded that eurodollar traders at Citicorp, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Barclays PLC and RBS, the members of the cartel, communicated through an exclusive electronic chat room to influence benchmark exchange rates between December 2007 and January 20137. Citicorp, JPMorgan, Barclays and RBS eventually agreed to pay fines in excess of 2.5 billion Dollars8.
In Turkey, on the other hand, the Turkish Competition Board (“TCB”) investigated similar claims against 14 leading banks including the RBS Istanbul Branch, Barclays Bank PLC., and Citibank A.Ş. in 2016. Interestingly, however, the TCB decided not to initiate a full-fledged investigation against these banks after an extensive preliminary investigation. As far as can be understood from the reasoned decision, the TCB found that the traders exchanged competitively sensitive information, but concluded that the information exchange was not sufficient to create anti-competitive effects in Turkey9.
You can reach the entire text here.
Share
Related persons
You can contact us for detailed information.

Legal Information
This briefing is for information purposes; it is not legal advice. If you have questions, please call us. All rights reserved.
You May Be Interested In
25 May 2026
Secure payment system becomes mandatory in real estate sales
With the Regulation Amending the Regulation on Real Estate Trade, which was published in the Official Gazette dated 29 April 2026 and…
21 May 2026
Turkish competition law newsletter – Issue 2026/2
The Turkish competition landscape rarely stands still, and this Spring 2026 edition of the Paksoy Turkish Competition Law Newsletter…
15 May 2026
VERBIS registration deadline set to 5 June for data controllers newly subject to the requirement based on 2025 accounts
With Decision No. 2026/1026 dated 13 May 2026, the Turkish Personal Data Protection Board extended the deadline for registration with the…
11 May 2026
Maternity and paternity leave periods revised under the Turkish Labour Code
The Law No. 7578 Amending the Social Services Law and Certain Other Laws, published in the Official Gazette dated 1 May 2026, has…
8 May 2026
Recent tax developments: presidential decree and a pending bill
A significant package of tax measures is currently taking shape in Türkiye. Presidential Decree No. 11257, published in the Official…
7 May 2026
Recent developments in Türkiye regarding the protection of children in digital environments
Since the beginning of 2026, notable legislative and policy developments have taken place in Türkiye on the protection of children in…