In corporate structures, executive-level employees represent the highest decision-making authority and are deeply involved in operational management. These roles are characterized not only by significant leadership responsibilities, but also a heightened expectation of trust. However, abuse of that trust is among the most critical form of misconduct challenging organizations today. Common forms of such misconduct include conflicts of interest, unauthorized use of company funds, abusive use of company expenses, fictitious or inflated transactions, and circumvention of approval processes.
According to the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners 2024 Report to the Nations, there is a clear correlation between a wrongdoer’s position within a company and both the financial impact. Although only a small percentage of reported cases involve individuals at the executive-level, these cases result in the highest financial losses, often several times greater than those caused by lower-level employees. This highlights how authority, access, and lack of oversight at the executive-level can allow improper behaviour to escalate.
Separation Strategy
The procedure for the unilateral termination of an executive-level employee on the grounds of misconduct does not differ from that applicable to non-executive employees. In both cases, misconduct constitutes just cause for the immediate termination of the employment contract without compensation, provided that the termination is effected within six working days from the date the employer becomes aware of the violation.
However, even where the misconduct results in financial loss or carries potential criminal implications, the termination of executive-level employees could be strategically structured through amicable separation methods. This approach stems from the strategic roles these individuals typically occupy, granting them access to sensitive information, including confidential business strategies and proprietary data, if misused or disclosed, could pose substantial risks to the organization.
Separation agreements address these concerns, define the terms of severance, mitigate legal disputes, and clearly establish post-termination obligations including confidentiality, non-compete, non-solicitation and non-poaching clauses.
Executive-level employee separations may also lead to corporate governance disruptions and affect business continuity. Therefore, companies should be prepared in advance by replacement signatory authority, who can act in critical functions such as executing payments, signing contracts, and managing other time-sensitive obligations.
Criminal Liability
Executive misconduct may also give rise to criminal liability, particularly under offenses such as abuse of trust. In such situations, employers may consider initiating criminal complaints, not only as a means of deterrence but also to reinforce internal accountability and support reputational remediation. However, the decision to initiate criminal proceedings should be carefully assessed within the broader legal and strategic framework of the organization, weighing potential benefits against possible reputational or operational consequences.
Conclusion
Termination of executive-level employees due to misconduct requires a deliberate, balanced approach that aligns with legal, compliance and corporate governance considerations. The strategic use of separation agreements, combined with enforceable restrictive covenants, can help contain reputational and operational risks. Moreover, leadership transitions at the executive-level should be managed proactively to avoid governance gaps that could impair decision-making and business continuity. Where appropriate, the use of criminal proceedings should be carefully weighed as part of the organization’s overall legal and risk strategy.
First published in the Edition 8, No. 2 of LIR Türkiye.
Share
Related persons
You can contact us for detailed information.


Legal Information
This briefing is for information purposes; it is not legal advice. If you have questions, please call us. All rights reserved.
You May Be Interested In
27 June 2025
New Block Exemption Communiqué on Specialization Agreements Published
With the publication of the Communiqué No. 2025/2 on Specialization Agreements (“New Communiqué”) by the Turkish Competition Authority in…
23 June 2025
Recent developments in Turkish e-commerce law
Following the entry into force of Law No. 7416 Amending Law No. 6563 on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce, the Turkish Ministry of…
2 June 2025
Pricing of Medicinal Products for Human Use in Türkiye
Pricing of medicinal products in Türkiye is governed by a comprehensive regulatory framework that imposes specific obligations on…
20 May 2025
The Regional Court of Appeal Reaffirmed the Application of the New York Convention and the Prohibition of Révision au Fond in Enforcement Proceedings
In its decision dated 21 April 2025, the 9th Civil Chamber of the Adana Regional Court of Appeal (“Regional Court of Appeal”) ruled that,…
14 May 2025
The Future of Hydrogen Energy in Türkiye
Hydrogen energy is emerging as a key pillar in the global transition towards renewable energy sources. With its versatile applications in…
14 May 2025
Turkish IPOs in Istanbul, London and the United States – Key Issues for Market Participants
The Turkish IPO market has continued its robust growth in recent years, with 179 companies completing IPOs between 2021 and 2024, raising…