Annual leave is a constitutional right of employees in Türkiye, serving not only to protect their well-being but also to support occupational health and safety measures.
The Turkish labour law sets out statutory minimum annual paid leave periods, which can be increased through mutual arrangements between the employers and the employees. While these statutory provisions generally apply to most employment relationships, the situation becomes more complex when it comes to high-level executives.
High-level executives, given their managerial authority and absence of an overseeing superior to approve their leaves, often bypass annual leave procedures and do not formalize their leave requests appropriately. This practice creates significant challenges for employers, particularly during termination of employment, as unused annual leave days’ must be paid-off to employees regardless of the termination reason, which may lead to substantial financial burden for companies.
Furthermore, under Turkish labour law, the burden of proof lies with the employer to demonstrate that annual leave was duly taken by the employee, typically by presenting a signed leave record or a similar document. In the absence of such documentation or credible evidence showing that the employees took their annual leave, it will be assumed under Turkish law that the leave was not taken.
In the previous decisions, the Court of Appeals overturned decisions of the lower courts that partially accepted employee’s unused annual leave payments mainly on procedural grounds such as judge’s failure to obtain employee’s statement on the subject matter. This was a rather mild approach for overturning the lower court’s ruling, focusing not on the substantive merits of the case but merely on procedural grounds.
However, in a 2024 landmark decision, the Court of Appeals applied a 50% reduction in the unused annual paid leave entitlement of an executive working as the general manager of the company. The court underlined that the general manager had the authority to arrange annual leave documentation and further stressed that it was against the ordinary course of life for an employee to work for nine years without taking annual leave.
This decision marks a significant milestone for employers, offering a less conventional interpretation of annual leave payments. By acknowledging the unique dynamics of executive roles, the ruling introduces a more balanced perspective that aligns with the practical realities of management responsibilities, paving the way for more balanced legal outcomes in similar disputes.
First published in the Edition 7, No. 2 of LIR Türkiye.
Share
Related persons
You can contact us for detailed information.

Legal Information
This briefing is for information purposes; it is not legal advice. If you have questions, please call us. All rights reserved.
You May Be Interested In
2 June 2025
Pricing of Medicinal Products for Human Use in Türkiye
Pricing of medicinal products in Türkiye is governed by a comprehensive regulatory framework that imposes specific obligations on…
20 May 2025
The Regional Court of Appeal Reaffirmed the Application of the New York Convention and the Prohibition of Révision au Fond in Enforcement Proceedings
In its decision dated 21 April 2025, the 9th Civil Chamber of the Adana Regional Court of Appeal (“Regional Court of Appeal”) ruled that,…
14 May 2025
The Future of Hydrogen Energy in Türkiye
Hydrogen energy is emerging as a key pillar in the global transition towards renewable energy sources. With its versatile applications in…
14 May 2025
Turkish IPOs in Istanbul, London and the United States – Key Issues for Market Participants
The Turkish IPO market has continued its robust growth in recent years, with 179 companies completing IPOs between 2021 and 2024, raising…
29 April 2025
Regulation on Private Health Institutions Providing Outpatient Diagnosis and Treatment
The Regulation on Private Health Institutions Providing Outpatient Diagnosis and Treatment Services (“Regulation“) was published in the…
29 April 2025
The Turkish Regional Court of Appeal in Ankara, 31st Civil Chamber, Confirmed That Preliminary Attachment Can Be Imposed on the Respondent’s Assets Pending Enforcement Proceedings
In proceedings for the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, it is crucial to secure the enforcement of the award, in other words, to…